
Broadcast programs are teaching more than microphones and mixing boards. But students still deserve a clearer picture of lean staffs, wider duties, unpredictable schedules and what the first paycheck may look like.
By Joe “Crash” Kelley
Research current through September 11, 2026
If you are talented, curious and drawn to radio, I want you in this business.I also want you to know exactly what you are walking into.
That is the tension behind this article. Radio needs a new generation of hosts, producers, reporters, programmers, sellers, editors and creators. But the job waiting on the other side of graduation may bear little resemblance to the version still pictured in a recruitment brochure.
In many markets, a “radio job” is no longer one station, one shift and one neatly bounded title. It can be an air shift plus production, social video, web updates, promotions, client work, automation and whatever broke five minutes before you went live.
I know because I am responsible for operations and production across five stations, soon six. That sentence would once have described a department. Today, it can describe one person’s normal week.This is not an argument against studying broadcasting. It is an argument for respecting students enough to prepare them for the radio business they will actually enter.
Start with the part that tends to disappear from the campus tour.The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics counted about 21,800 broadcast announcer and radio DJ jobs in 2025. It projects that occupation will shrink 8 percent by 2035.
The median wage in May 2025 was $22.76 an hour across the occupation and $21.02 at radio stations. BLS also says part-time work may be common, with shifts that can include early mornings, nights, weekends and holidays.
Those numbers are not a reason to tell a talented student to choose something else. They are a reason to talk plainly about tuition, debt, relocation, side work and the likely first rung of the ladder.
There is encouraging news inside the same data. BLS projects about 3,700 openings a year for the combined category of announcers and DJs, all created by people leaving the occupation rather than by overall growth. That figure includes non-radio DJs, so it should never be sold as 3,700 radio openings.
Still, it tells us something important: a shrinking occupation is not a dead occupation. People retire, move, change careers and create openings.Radio’s physical footprint is still enormous. The Federal Communications Commission counted 15,667 licensed full-power AM, commercial FM and educational FM stations as of September 30, 2025, plus 1,985 low-power FM stations.
Many share employees or programming, so a station count is not a job count. It does show that radio remains a large national system with brands to run, local audiences to serve and work that still has to get done.The real message is neither “everything is fine” nor “there is no future here.” The market is smaller, the entry path is less predictable and the people who arrive with useful range have a better chance of finding a place in it.
It would be easy to write a broad attack claiming that broadcast education is frozen in 1995. The public curricula I reviewed do not support that.Rider University’s Radio and Podcasting major includes audio, video, digital media, social media, law, ethics, podcasting, programming and station operations.
Iowa Lakes Community College combines writing and announcing with digital marketing, photography, video, social strategy, analytics and an online student station.
The private Be On Air Radio and TV Broadcasting program promotes commercial production, streaming, video, social content, podcasting, analytics, audition materials and an internship capstone.That is not yesterday’s tool kit. Plenty of educators understand that audio now travels with video, social content, analytics and audience development.
The gap is more complicated. A school can teach modern tools while its recruiting language, salary presentation or career counseling still paints a cleaner and rosier picture than the graduate will meet.In other words, the course catalog may have changed faster than the sales pitch.
One private-school careers page describes broadcasting as an “ever-growing” field with a “never-ending” need for trained professionals and says radio stations are always looking for hosts.Its actual curriculum appears broad and current.
The career language, however, only works if “broadcasting” means a much wider collection of media jobs than the BLS radio-announcer category.That distinction cannot be left for an 18-year-old or a parent to discover later.Iowa Lakes offers another useful example. Its program page lists a wide range of possible careers and displays earnings figures of $65,010 nationally and $41,350 in Iowa, along with 1.1 percent projected growth.
Those numbers may accurately describe one or more jobs within that broad collection. What the page does not make obvious is which occupation each headline number represents, whether it assumes full-time work and how closely it applies to a student whose specific goal is radio announcing.
Fullerton College’s Media Studies page describes radio production, on-air work, industry equipment and a link to federal salary information.
It also says the page was last updated in May 2018.That date does not prove the teaching is old. It does tell a prospective student that the public description alone cannot confirm what is current.None of these examples proves that a school is dishonest or that its classrooms are failing.
I reviewed public pages, not every syllabus, counseling session or graduate record.They do demonstrate how easily a modern program can be wrapped in career language that is too broad, too old or too promotional to support a major financial decision.
The best description of a modern on-air position may come from BLS itself.
The agency says announcers and radio DJs may operate equipment, sell commercial time, develop advertisements, create recorded material, handle work once performed by editors or broadcast technicians, maintain social media and appear at community events.Current job listings turn that description into a schedule.
An Audacy morning co-host opening in Baltimore asked applicants for audio, social handles and examples of social content.The job combined live performance, original material for social platforms, online personality management, music and commercial logs, contests, board operation, production, events and remotes. It also required nights, weekends, holidays and fill-in availability.
Recent leadership openings from iHeartMedia, Cox Media Group and Dick Broadcasting bundled programming with on-air work, talent coaching, imaging, promotions, websites, streaming, social media, analytics, FCC compliance, budgets, sales collaboration and revenue development.
Those are individual listings, not a scientific survey. They still prove that named employers are asking one person to connect creative, technical, operational and business responsibilities.Radio news shows the same pressure.
The latest RTDNA and Newhouse School staffing survey found a small improvement in 2025, with the typical full-time radio news staff rising to two.Yet the median at commercial stations was still one, and 71.6 percent of surveyed newsrooms relied on centralized, multi-station operations.
Students should know how to work when help is limited, priorities collide and one story must serve several platforms.They should also know that versatility has a boundary. Being able to do several things well is valuable. Accepting an impossible workload without priorities, training or appropriate pay is not a career skill.
The employment picture is not a straight slide downward.RTDNA’s 2026 hiring report found that radio news hiring rebounded during 2025. Average replacement hires and new hires both reached 0.9 positions among surveyed newsrooms, with reporters the most frequently hired role.
A companion RTDNA salary and recruiting report found that more than a quarter of managers with openings said recruiting had become harder. About 29 percent said they could not find the right candidates.
That should get the attention of both schools and employers. If students are paying to become job-ready while managers say they cannot find job-ready people, the pipeline needs a tighter connection to the work.It also creates an opening for the student who is truly prepared.A strong voice still matters.
So do curiosity, local knowledge, timing, judgment and the ability to make a listener care. The candidate who can combine those qualities with clean production, useful video, digital instincts, dependable execution and some understanding of revenue becomes much easier to imagine on the payroll.
Schools often answer questions about value with a placement percentage. A percentage is helpful, but it is only the beginning of the answer.
The Colorado Media School’s 2025 disclosure, for example, reported 68 students enrolled in an eight-month Radio and Television Broadcasting cohort, a 75 percent graduation rate and a 77 percent employment rate.Those are meaningful numbers.The accreditor’s rules give that employment figure more substance.
The Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges generally requires a counted placement to be paid, related to the training, aligned with most program objectives, reasonably sustainable and verified.What the one-page rate does not show is just as important to the person writing the tuition check:
A strong school should want to answer those questions. Specific outcomes would allow the best programs to prove their value with more than a percentage and a few success stories.
A serious admissions representative should welcome serious questions. Take these to the campus visit, put the answers in writing and ask to see the source document.
Listen to the shape of the answer. Recent dates, named occupations, written definitions and de-identified outcome details are good signs.A famous graduate, a top-end salary and “it depends on how badly you want it” are not answers.
The old advice was to build a great aircheck.Build one. Then keep going.A graduate should be able to show a hiring manager:
The portfolio should prove both completion and potential. A hiring manager needs to see that the applicant can originate an idea, execute it across the necessary platforms, meet a deadline and explain why the work matters.
Schools can test that with a capstone that feels like a real week in radio: several brands, a weather emergency, a client campaign, a community remote, social and video deadlines, an automation problem and an audience report.
Grade the choices and handoffs as carefully as the finished audio.
AI belongs in that education too. Students should learn where it can speed transcription, research organization, versioning and routine production.They also need to understand verification, copyright, disclosure, local specificity and the point where an efficient tool begins producing generic work.Radio does not need faster sameness.
Broadcasters cannot complain that graduates are unprepared and then leave schools to guess what preparation means.Serve on advisory boards. Share real job descriptions. Host internships that teach rather than use students as free labor. Critique capstones.
Give faculty access to current systems. Explain what changed in the cluster this year.
Employers also need to make “multi-skilled” a credible opportunity instead of a polite label for five jobs at entry-level pay.Define priorities. Train people. Pay for the value required. Give talented beginners a path toward greater responsibility.A school can prepare someone for a modern cluster. It cannot make permanent understaffing healthy.
I do not want a clear-eyed article about radio careers to become an argument against radio careers.T
his business still needs the person who hears what everybody else missed, knows the town, writes the line that lands, makes a caller feel seen, stays calm when the system fails and turns a client’s vague request into something listeners will not hate.The tools will change. The staffing chart will change.
That kind of value will not.So if radio is what you want, bring the dream. Then ask harder questions.Choose the program that gives you real equipment, real audiences, current tools, candid outcome data and a portfolio wide enough to prove what you can do.Radio does not need fewer talented people.
It needs talented people whose education respected them enough to tell them the whole story—and prepared them well enough to write the next chapter themselves.
If you work in radio, teach it, hire for it or hope to enter it, share this article with somebody who needs the full picture.For more candid conversations about radio, production, programming and the creative work that still makes this business worth caring about, bookmark SonicAttention.com and subscribe to The Signal on LinkedIn.